 Tel:+86-755-26890807
News Detail
Home / News / Health Watch / World Diabetes Day | HbA1c, UACR and Diabetes-CKD Solutions

World Diabetes Day | HbA1c, UACR and Diabetes-CKD Solutions

Author: Goldsite Team     Publish Time: 2026-11-14      Origin: Site

Inquire

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button

Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Co-management: A Medical Guideline Review

HPLC HbA1c testing + specific-protein testing as a combined solution
Reference guidelines: KDIGO 2024 · ADA Standards of Care 2025
World Diabetes Day feature · 14 November 2026

Contents

1. Background: The need for diabetes and CKD co-management

Diabetes is one of the most common chronic metabolic diseases worldwide, and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is its most serious microvascular complication. About one-third of people with type 1 diabetes and 50% of people with type 2 diabetes develop diabetic nephropathy during the course of the disease, and about 50% of those cases eventually progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In China, the incidence of DKD among people with diabetes is as high as 30%–40%, and DKD has become a leading cause of ESRD.

“Diabetes–CKD co-management” has become a core consensus in nephrology and endocrinology in recent years. Both the KDIGO 2024 guideline and the ADA 2025 Standards of Care emphasize that people with diabetes and CKD need collaborative management by endocrinology and nephrology, moving from glucose control alone to combined cardio-renal protection: while controlling blood glucose, detect and intervene in kidney injury early, and slow the progression of CKD.

Core combined solution: HPLC HbA1c testing (reflecting mean glucose over 2–3 months, an etiological assessment) + specific-protein testing (UACR and tubular markers, reflecting the degree of kidney target-organ injury). The two are complementary and enable a two-dimensional assessment of diabetes and its kidney complications.

DKD incidence in people with diabetes
30–40%
Share of patients with early DKD
32.5%
CKD may already be present at T2DM diagnosis
Yes
Recommended UACR screening frequency
≥1 / year

2. Clinical significance of annual UACR (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio) screening

2.1 What is UACR?

UACR (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio) is the ratio of urinary albumin concentration to urinary creatinine concentration, reported in mg/g (or mg/mmol). Because creatinine excretion is relatively constant, the ratio corrects for urine concentration or dilution, so a single spot urine can accurately reflect albumin excretion without a 24-hour collection.

Kidney Glomerulus Filtration Urine Albumin + creatinine UACR Urine albumin ÷ urine creatinine Unit: mg/g Filtration barrier injury Albumin leaks into urine Measurable in a spot urine
Figure 1. Principle of UACR testing: glomerular injury → albumin leakage → spot-urine measurement

2.2 Diagnostic thresholds and staging of UACR

CategoryUACR (mg/g)UACR (mg/mmol)Corresponding AER (mg/24h)KDIGO albuminuria stage
Normal< 30< 3< 30A1 (normal to mildly increased)
Microalbuminuria30–3003–3030–300A2 (moderately increased)
Macroalbuminuria> 300> 30> 300A3 (severely increased)

Optimal normal valueACR < 10 mg/g KDIGO clinical decision cut-points 30 and 300 mg/g

2.3 How UACR reflects injury to the glomerular filtration membrane

In a healthy kidney, the glomerular filtration barrier has three layers: the endothelial cell layer, the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and the podocyte slit diaphragm. Under normal conditions, the GBM carries a strong negative charge (heparan sulfate proteoglycans) and effectively restricts the passage of negatively charged albumin (pI 4.8–5.2).

In the hyperglycemic state of diabetes, the glomerulus undergoes the following pathological changes:

  1. Glomerular hypertension and hyperfiltration: hyperglycemia → increased proximal tubular reabsorption of glucose and sodium → weakened tubuloglomerular feedback → afferent arteriolar dilation → intraglomerular hypertension → mechanical injury
  2. GBM thickening: abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix, detectable as early as 1.5–2.5 years after onset
  3. Podocyte injury or detachment: foot-process effacement and podocyte apoptosis → loss of barrier integrity → albumin leakage
  4. Mesangial expansion: mesangial-cell proliferation and excessive matrix deposition → eventually Kimmelstiel–Wilson nodules (a characteristic lesion of diabetic nephropathy)

Thus, the appearance of urinary albumin is a direct marker of glomerular filtration-barrier injury. Abnormalities can be detected before eGFR declines, making it one of the earliest biochemical markers of diabetic nephropathy.

2.4 Why a spot urine rather than a 24-hour collection?

Limitations of 24-hour urine: cumbersome collection, poor patient adherence, and large pre-analytical error (incomplete collection and laboratory error in urine-volume measurement).

Advantages of spot-urine UACR: it uses the relatively constant excretion of creatinine to correct for changes in urine volume; it correlates closely with the 24-hour albumin excretion rate (AER); first-morning ACR can even be more accurate than AER; and it requires only a single spot sample, which can be completed in clinic and is suitable for large-scale screening.

2.5 Association of UACR with cardiovascular events and kidney outcomes

UACR is not only a kidney marker, but also a barometer of systemic vascular health:

  • Cardiovascular events: an elevated UACR is independently associated with higher cardiovascular risk, even in people with diabetes or hypertension who do not have CKD
  • Cerebrovascular disease: an elevated UACR is associated with cerebral microbleeds
  • Kidney outcomes: UACR is an independent predictor of CKD progression; a doubling of ACR beyond biological variation (~30–40%) warrants clinical assessment
  • All-cause mortality: the level of albuminuria is positively associated with all-cause mortality
  • Risk prediction: UACR is one of the core variables in the Tangri Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE)

2.6 Guideline recommendations for annual UACR screening

GuidelineRecommendationGrade
ADA 2025 (11.1a)In T1DM of ≥5 years’ duration and in all people with T2DM, assess UACR and eGFR annuallyB
ADA 2025 (11.1b)In people with confirmed CKD, monitor UACR and eGFR 1–4 times per year according to CKD stageB
KDIGO 2024In people with CKD, measure albuminuria and eGFR at least once a year; twice a year in high risk, and ≥3 times a year in very high risk1B

Clinical significance in brief: annual UACR screening is the core entry marker for diabetes–CKD co-management. It can detect early kidney injury before eGFR declines, guide the start of RAS blockade (ACEi/ARB is recommended when UACR is ≥30 mg/g), inform the indications for SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, and help predict cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. It is simple, low-cost and high-value — which is why it is a screening test that all people with diabetes should have at least once a year.

UACR screening → clinical decision pathway UACR < 30 mg/g Normal / stage A1 UACR 30–300 mg/g Microalbuminuria / stage A2 UACR > 300 mg/g Macroalbuminuria / stage A3 Repeat once a year Optimize glucose / BP control ACEi/ARB not recommended Primary prevention Start ACEi/ARB SGLT2i (eGFR≥20) Goal: UACR reduction ≥30% Repeat ≥2 times a year Max tolerated ACEi/ARB SGLT2i + finerenone Refer if eGFR<30 Repeat ≥3 times a year Combine with HbA1c: assess glucose control at every UACR stage HbA1c not at target → intensify lowering | UACR↑ but HbA1c at target → “metabolic memory” or other pathways The two are not interchangeable and must be monitored together
Figure 2. UACR screening results and the clinical decision pathway

3. HPLC HbA1c testing: the gold standard for long-term diabetes monitoring

3.1 Biological basis of HbA1c

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a stable product formed when the free amino group of the N-terminal valine on the β-chain of hemoglobin in red blood cells binds glucose in serum through a non-enzymatic reaction. The reaction is continuous, slow and irreversible. Red blood cells have a lifespan of about 120 days (three months), so HbA1c effectively reflects mean glucose over the past 8–12 weeks (2–3 months), expressed as a percentage of total hemoglobin.

3.2 Principle of HPLC measurement

Ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC) separates different glycated forms of hemoglobin on a cation-exchange resin column by differences in charge. HbA1c carries more negative charge than non-glycated HbA and elutes before HbA under defined conditions. The result is calculated as the HbA1c peak area as a percentage of total hemoglobin peak area. Each sample produces a chromatogram, which can be used to judge whether a hemoglobin variant is present.

3.3 Methodological advantages of HPLC

DimensionWhat it means
PrecisionInter-laboratory CV ≤3%; some methods reach 2%
AccuracyNGSP reference method; highly correlated with the IFCC reference method (r=0.9940)
Resistance to interferenceThe chromatogram can identify hemoglobin variants (HbS, HbC and others)
ThroughputFully automated, suitable for large clinical sample volumes
TraceabilityDCCT/UKPDS data were established directly on HPLC methods

3.4 HPLC compared with other methods

ComparisonHPLC (ion-exchange)ImmunoassayEnzymatic methodCapillary electrophoresis
PrecisionHigh (CV ≤3%)HighHighHigh
Variant identificationYes (visible on the chromatogram)NoNoYes
Variant interferenceSome variant peaks may be maskedNot interfered with by HbS/HbCNot interfered withLess interference
TraceabilityNGSP/DCCTIFCCIFCCIFCC

3.5 How the gold-standard status was established — DCCT and UKPDS

The DCCT (1983–1993): a landmark study led by the U.S. NIH, with 9 years of follow-up in people with type 1 diabetes. Bio-Rad HPLC was the sole comparison method. It established an HbA1c reference upper limit of 6.0% and a treatment threshold of ≥7%, and confirmed a strong association between HbA1c and retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy.

The UKPDS (1998): the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, with 10 years of follow-up in type 2 diabetes. It reproduced the DCCT conclusion — reductions in complications were directly related to reductions in HbA1c.

These two landmark trials established a causal relationship between glucose control (as measured by HbA1c) and diabetic complications, making HbA1c an irreplaceable core marker for long-term diabetes monitoring.

3.6 Standardization systems

NGSP (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program): established in 1996, administered by the CDC, with Bio-Rad HPLC as the reference method.

IFCC (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine): the 2007 Milan consensus established IFCC as the only globally valid reference system. Conversion: NGSP (%) = 0.0915 × IFCC (mmol/mol) + 2.15

3.7 Clinical use of HbA1c

UseCriterion
Diagnosis of diabetesHbA1c ≥ 6.5%(ADACriterion)
General adult treatment target< 7.0% (53 mmol/mol)
More stringent glucose target< 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)
When CKD is presentIndividualized adjustment (consider hypoglycemia risk, anemia and other effects)

Special considerations for HbA1c when CKD is present: insulin clearance falls in CKD, increasing hypoglycemia risk; anemia, shortened red-cell lifespan and EPO use can affect the accuracy of HbA1c measurement. ADA recommends that the HbA1c target be individualized when CKD is present.

4. Combined solution: a dual assessment strategy with HbA1c and specific-protein testing

4.1 Core idea of the combined solution

HbA1c + specific-protein testing: dual assessment HbA1c (HPLC) Mean glucose over 2–3 months Etiology: glucose-control assessment Diagnosis: ≥6.5% Target: <7% Specific-protein testing UACR + tubular markers Target organ: kidney-injury assessment UACR ≥30 → glomerular injury + Integrated diabetes–CKD assessment Full risk stratification + treatment guidance Glucose control and kidney protection together Not interchangeable (r=0.16)
Figure 3. Dual-assessment logic of the HbA1c + specific-protein combined solution

4.2 Rationale

  1. HbA1c reflects the cause (glucose): because glycation is irreversible, it is the gold standard for 2–3 months of glucose control, but it does not reflect short-term glucose fluctuation and does not directly reflect target-organ injury
  2. UACR and specific proteins reflect target-organ injury: they directly reflect structural kidney injury, but cannot show the state of glucose control
  3. The two are not interchangeable: recent research shows only a moderate correlation between UACR reduction and HbA1c improvement (r=0.16), suggesting that kidney protection and glucose control have independent mechanistic pathways
  4. DKD can occur when HbA1c is normal: the LIFE-Adult Study showed moderate albuminuria in people with normal HbA1c but impaired glucose tolerance — HbA1c screening alone may miss early DKD

4.3 Complementary value

Assessment dimensionHbA1c aloneUACR aloneCombined testing
Glucose assessment✓✗✓ Complete
Kidney injury✗✓✓ Complete
Detection of early DKDIndirectCan detect microalbuminuriaEarlier
Risk stratificationGlucose dimension onlyKidney dimension onlyFull stratification
Recognition of metabolic memory✗✗✓ HbA1c normal but UACR↑

Basic panel: HbA1c (HPLC) + UACR + eGFR → annual screening for all people with diabetes

Extended panel: basic panel + urinary α1-MG/RBP (tubular injury) + serum cystatin C (more precise GFR) → for people with a normal UACR but a high suspicion of early DKD, or with progressive CKD

Comprehensive panel: extended panel + urine transferrin (glomerular charge barrier) + urine IgG (pore-size barrier) → when the cause of CKD is unclear, or finer stratification is needed

4.5 Diabetes and CKD co-management: HPLC HbA1c + Aristo Ur

Aristo Ur uses dual methodology (immunonephelometry and spectrophotometry), runs 200 tests per hour, and offers 48 assays. One instrument can complete the tests and automatically report ACR, as well as multiple urinary protein-to-creatinine ratios. Used together with the laboratory HPLC HbA1c line (HPLC HbA1c Analyzer), it forms the kidney side of this co-management solution: HbA1c is measured by ion-exchange HPLC, and ACR is calculated automatically after integrated testing of urine microalbumin and urine creatinine.

The pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) involves the combined action of two pathways: glomerular injury and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. In recent years the research paradigm has shifted from a glomerulus-centered view to a tubule-centered view, recognizing that tubular injury may play an earlier and more central role in the onset of DKD.

Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and corresponding markers Hyperglycemia (HbA1c ↑) Metabolic pathway AGEs↑ → ROS↑ → TGF-β1↑ Hemodynamic pathway RAS↑ → glomerular hypertension → hyperfiltration Inflammation → fibrosis pathway Glomerular injury GBM thickening · podocyte loss · mesangial expansion → albumin leakage Tubulointerstitial fibrosis TBM thickening · tubular atrophy · IFTA → GFR decline (94% of variance) Corresponding markers UACR · urine transferrin · urine IgG Corresponding markers α1-MG·β2-MG·RBP·Cystatin C
Figure 4. Pathogenic pathways of diabetic nephropathy and corresponding markers

Key insight: thickening of the tubular basement membrane (TBM) is among the earliest quantitatively detectable structural changes in the diabetic kidney, and can be observed even in patients with normoalbuminuria. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) are the most reliable histological predictors of DKD prognosis — together they can explain 94% of GFR variance in people with diabetes. This means that monitoring UACR alone (which reflects glomerular injury) may miss early tubulointerstitial injury, and that tubular markers (α1-MG, RBP, cystatin C and others) are needed as a complement.

6. Other laboratory markers for early prediction and management

In addition to UACR, the following laboratory markers can be used for early prediction and management of diabetes-related CKD. From different angles — the glomerular charge barrier, the pore-size barrier, tubular reabsorption, and more precise GFR estimation — they fill blind spots left by UACR. Combined testing can substantially improve the detection of early DKD.

6.1 Urine transferrin (Transferrin, TRF)

Early injury to the glomerular charge barrier Appears earlier than microalbuminuria
Molecular weightAbout 77,000–81,000 Da (intermediate-molecular-weight protein)
Isoelectric point (pI)5.5–6.6 (higher than albumin, 4.8–5.2)
Mechanism of injuryTransferrin carries less negative charge, so charge repulsion at the GBM is weaker; it leaks more readily than albumin when the charge barrier is injured early
Reference range0–2.0 mg/L (measured value in normal controls about 0.6±0.2 mg/L)
Abnormal valuesDM with normoalbuminuria: 2.4±0.9 mg/L (P<0.001); DM with microalbuminuria: 4.4±1.5 mg/L
Assay methodsELISA, immunoturbidimetry

Core value: a rise in urine transferrin appears earlier than microalbuminuria. In people with diabetes who still have a normal urine microalbumin, urine transferrin excretion is already significantly elevated. A 24-month prospective study by Narita T et al. (Diabetes Care, 2006) showed that transferrin can predict progression to microalbuminuria in patients with normal urinary albumin. UTRF is an independent risk factor for diabetic nephropathy (OR=16.138, P<0.001).

6.2 Urine IgG

Severe injury to the glomerular pore-size barrier Strong predictor of end-stage kidney disease
Molecular weightAbout 150,000–170,000 Da (high-molecular-weight protein)
Mechanism of injuryA normal glomerulus is almost impermeable to IgG; IgG in urine indicates severe pore-size barrier injury, and a shift from selective to non-selective proteinuria
Reference range< 5.0 mg/L
Selectivity proteinuria index (SPI)SPI = (urine IgG × serum transferrin) / (serum IgG × urine transferrin); SPI ≥0.21 = non-selective proteinuria (poor prognosis)
FEIgG cut-off0.043% (values above this predict ESRD, HR=37.1)
Assay methodsImmunoturbidimetry, immunonephelometry, ELISA

Core value: urine IgG is a stronger indicator of diabetic nephropathy than microalbuminuria (Mohan S et al., 2012). The fractional excretion of IgG (FEIgG) is a strong independent predictor of ESRD (HR=37.1). If α1-microglobulin excretion is also increased, this suggests combined glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury and a worse prognosis.

6.3 Urinary α1-microglobulin (α1-Microglobulin, α1-MG)

Early proximal tubular injury Stable in acidic urine (superior to β2-MG)
Molecular weightAbout 33,000 Da (low-molecular-weight protein)
Mechanism of injuryFree α1-MG is freely filtered at the glomerulus, and 95–99% is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule; urinary excretion rises when the tubule is injured
Reference range< 12 mg/L (morning urine); normal excretion 5–50 mg/day
Advantage vs β2-MGRetains 86.4% of activity after 4 days at room temperature in acidic urine; higher excretion (less measurement error); not affected by malignancy; immunoturbidimetric methods can be automated
Assay methodsImmunoturbidimetry (preferred), immunonephelometry, ELISA

Core value: in people with diabetes who are still in the normoalbuminuric stage, urinary α1-MG is already significantly higher than normal. Early tubular injury in diabetic nephropathy may precede glomerular injury, and urinary α1-MG can serve as a sensitive marker at this stage. After contrast exposure, urinary α1-MG rises in about 10–15% of patients, about 24–48 hours before a rise in serum creatinine, giving it early-warning value. It is increasingly regarded as a preferred low-molecular-weight protein marker over β2-MG.

6.4 Urinary β2-microglobulin (β2-Microglobulin, β2-MG)

Proximal tubular reabsorption function Unstable in acidic urine (main limitation)
Molecular weight11,800 Da (99 amino acids)
Mechanism of injuryFreely filtered at the glomerulus, with 99.9% reabsorbed and degraded in the proximal tubule; a 10% fall in reabsorption can increase excretion about 30-fold
Reference range< 0.2 mg/L (370 μg/24h)
Main limitationDegrades rapidly at pH <5.5 (cathepsin D activation); urine must be alkalinized before testing; affected by malignancy
vs α1-MGα1-MG is superior to β2-MG in acid stability, excretion amount, measurement accuracy and resistance to interference from malignancy
Assay methodsRIA, ELISA, immunoturbidimetry, latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry

Caution: β2-MG is a classic tubular-injury marker with very high sensitivity, but it is highly unstable in acidic urine (it degrades rapidly at pH <5.5), which is its main clinical limitation. Samples must be fresh and alkalinized (pH >5.5) before testing. Because of this limitation, RBP and α1-MG are considered more practical and reliable in clinical use.

6.5 Urinary retinol-binding protein (Retinol Binding Protein, RBP)

High-sensitivity proximal tubular marker More acid-stable than β2-MG
Molecular weightAbout 21,000 Da
Mechanism of injuryA vitamin A transport protein synthesized in the liver; free RBP is rapidly filtered at the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed in the proximal convoluted tubule; urinary levels rise when the tubule is injured
Reference range< 0.7 mg/L
Core advantagesNot affected by pH or proteolytic enzymes (stable in acidic urine); not affected by sex, posture or diurnal variation; urinary RBP excretion correlates clearly with the degree of tubulointerstitial injury
vs β2-MGFar more stable than β2-MG, and more practical and reliable in use
Assay methodsELISA, rapid latex immunonephelometry, immunoturbidimetry

Core value: urinary RBP can detect tubular dysfunction early, sensitively reflects the degree of proximal tubular injury, and can serve as a sensitive biochemical marker for monitoring the course of disease, guiding treatment and judging prognosis. In 2023, Zhou et al. (BMC Nephrology) evaluated urinary RBP as an early diagnostic marker of diabetic nephropathy. It has an important place in the reliable monitoring of tubular injury in DKD.

6.6 Serum cystatin C (Cystatin C, Cys C)

More precise GFR estimation Superior to serum creatinine Recommended in KDIGO 2024
Molecular weight13,300 Da (122 amino acids)
ProductionProduced at a constant rate by all nucleated cells (housekeeping gene); not affected by age, sex, body weight, muscle mass or inflammation
MetabolismFreely filtered at the glomerulus → completely reabsorbed and degraded in the proximal convoluted tubule → does not return to blood → no tubular secretion
Determinants of serum concentrationDetermined only by GFR (concentration is constant from age 1 to about 60)
Reference range0.51–1.09 mg/L; >1.0 mg/L suggests impaired kidney function
Assay methodsPETIA (particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry), PENIA (particle-enhanced immunonephelometry)

Core advantages — why it is superior to serum creatinine:

  • Not affected by muscle mass: serum creatinine is affected by muscle metabolism, and can be falsely low in older, thin or long-term bedridden people; cystatin C is not affected
  • Earlier and more sensitive: serum creatinine rises clearly only after GFR has fallen by more than 50%; cystatin C can detect abnormalities when GFR is only mildly reduced
  • No tubular secretion: 10–20% of creatinine is secreted by the tubule; cystatin C is not
  • Not affected by diet: creatinine is affected by protein intake; cystatin C is not
  • Early diagnosis of DKD: cystatin C has 40% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting DKD, and can identify the hyperfiltration stage of diabetic nephropathy earlier than creatinine

A specific KDIGO 2024 recommendation: when cystatin C is available, estimate eGFR with the combined creatinine–cystatin C equation (eGFRcr-cys), because the combined formula is closest to measured GFR. Cystatin C should be measured when eGFR is <60, or when muscle mass is abnormal, in liver disease or heart failure, or when drug doses need to be adjusted.

Value of combined diagnosis: cystatin C together with urine transferrin (UTRF) has the greatest diagnostic value for diabetic nephropathy (AUC=0.909, sensitivity 0.917, specificity 0.760).

Relative increase (normal = 1) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Normal (>90) G3a (45-59) G3b (30-44) G4 (15-29) G5 (<15) GFR stage (mL/min/1.73m²) Cystatin C Serum creatinine (Scr)
Figure 5. Sensitivity of cystatin C versus serum creatinine at different GFR levels

7. Comparison of all markers

MarkerSite of injury reflectedMolecular weightReference rangeCore advantageMain limitation
UACRGlomerular filtration barrier—<30 mg/gInternationally recognized gold standard; simpleAppears later; does not reflect tubular injury
Urine transferrinGlomerular charge barrier~79 kDa<2.0 mg/LAppears earlier than microalbuminuriaNo unified international standard
Urine IgGGlomerular pore-size barrier~150 kDa<5.0 mg/LPredicts ESRD (HR=37.1)Reflects later-stage injury
Urine α1-MGProximal tubule~33 kDa<12 mg/LGood acid stability; not affected by malignancyStandardized local reagent kits still to be resolved
Urine β2-MGProximal tubule~11.8 kDa<0.2 mg/LVery high sensitivity (10% fall in reabsorption ≈ 30-fold rise in excretion)Unstable in acidic urine
Urine RBPProximal tubule~21 kDa<0.7 mg/LNot affected by pH; more reliable than β2-MGSpecificity is only moderate
Serum cystatin CGFR (glomerular filtration function)~13.3 kDa0.51–1.09 mg/LNot affected by muscle mass; sensitive to a mild fall in GFRAffected by inflammation, smoking and thyroid status
Normoalbuminuria Microalbuminuria Clinical nephropathy DKD progression timeline (1 = earliest → 5 = latest) Urine transferrin Urine α1-MG Urine RBP UACR (micro) Serum cystatin C Urine β2-MG Urine IgG UACR (macro)
Figure 6. Sequence in which markers become abnormal during the progression of diabetic nephropathy

8. Summary of KDIGO and ADA guideline recommendations

8.1 Core recommendations from the KDIGO 2024 CKD guideline

Recommendation no.ContentGrade
1.1.2.1In adults at risk of CKD, use eGFRcr; when cystatin C is available, use the combined eGFRcr-cys estimate1B
3.6.3In CKD with diabetes and A2/A3 proteinuria → start a RASi (ACEi or ARB)1B
3.7.1In T2D with CKD and eGFR ≥20 → recommend an SGLT2 inhibitor1A
3.8.1In T2D with eGFR >25, normal serum potassium, and persistent proteinuria after a max-tolerated RASi → a nonsteroidal MRA2A
3.9.1In T2D + CKD with inadequate glucose control on metformin + an SGLT2 inhibitor → a long-acting GLP-1 RA1B

8.2 Core recommendations from the ADA Standards of Care 2025 CKD chapter

Recommendation no.ContentGrade
11.1aT1DM of ≥5 years’ duration and all T2DM → assess UACR and eGFR annuallyB
11.1bConfirmed CKD → monitor UACR and eGFR 1–4 times per yearB
11.2Optimize glucose management to reduce CKD risk or slow progressionA
11.4aUACR ≥30 mg/g and/or eGFR <60 → strongly recommend an ACEi or ARBA
11.5aT2D + CKD + eGFR ≥20 → an SGLT2 inhibitorA
11.5bT2D + CKD → a GLP-1 RA to reduce cardiovascular risk and slow kidney diseaseA
11.5ceGFR ≥25 + albuminuria → a nonsteroidal MRAA
11.9Persistently rising albuminuria and/or a persistent fall in eGFR and/or eGFR <30 → refer to nephrologyA

8.3 Albuminuria stages and the CKD risk heat map (KDIGO 2024)

eGFR \ ACRA1 (<30 mg/g)A2 (30–300 mg/g)A3 (>300 mg/g)
G1 (≥90)Low riskModerate riskHigh risk
G2 (60–89)Low riskModerate riskHigh risk
G3a (45–59)Moderate riskHigh riskVery high risk
G3b (30–44)High riskVery high riskVery high risk
G4 (15–29)Very high riskVery high riskVery high risk
G5 (<15)Very high riskVery high riskVery high risk

8.4 UACR monitoring frequency (by CKD risk category)

Risk levelMonitoring frequencyApplicable group
Low riskOnce a yearG1-G2 + A1
Moderate riskOnce a yearG3a + A1 or G1-G2 + A2
High riskTwice a yearG3b + A1 or G3a + A2 or G1-G2 + A3
Very high risk≥3 times a year (up to 4)G4-G5 or G3b-G4 + A2-A3

9. Conclusions and clinical recommendations

Core conclusions

  1. Annual UACR screening is the entry marker for diabetes–CKD co-management: KDIGO and ADA recommend it consistently. It can detect early kidney injury before eGFR declines, guide the start of RAS blockade, SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, and help predict cardiovascular and kidney outcomes
  2. HPLC HbA1c is the irreplaceable gold standard for glucose monitoring: its evidence base was established by DCCT/UKPDS. It reflects mean glucose over 2–3 months, but special effects when CKD is present must be taken into account
  3. The HbA1c + specific-protein combined solution enables dual assessment: the etiological dimension (glucose control) plus the target-organ dimension (kidney injury). The two are not interchangeable (r=0.16). Combined testing covers the blind spots
  4. Combining multiple markers can substantially improve detection of early DKD: urine transferrin (charge barrier, earlier than albuminuria), urine IgG (pore-size barrier, prediction of ESRD), α1-MG/RBP (tubular injury, more acid-stable than β2-MG), and cystatin C (more precise GFR; KDIGO recommends combined eGFRcr-cys)
  5. Move from “glucose control alone” to combined cardio-renal protection: the 2026 ADA-EASD consensus emphasizes starting cardio-renal protective drugs (SGLT2 inhibitors / GLP-1 RAs / finerenone) at diagnosis, without being limited by the HbA1c level

Clinical recommendations

All people with diabetes (annual basic screening):

  • HbA1c (HPLC) — assessment of glucose control
  • UACR (spot urine) — screening for glomerular injury
  • eGFR (creatinine, plus cystatin C when needed) — assessment of kidney function

Normal UACR but a high suspicion of early DKD, or progressive CKD:

  • Urinary α1-MG or urinary RBP — proximal tubular injury
  • Serum cystatin C — more precise GFR estimation (eGFRcr-cys)
  • Urine transferrin — early injury to the glomerular charge barrier

When the cause of CKD is unclear, or finer stratification is needed:

  • Urine IgG + SPI — assess pore-size barrier injury and non-selective proteinuria
  • Urinary β2-MG — test after alkalinizing the urine (unstable in acidic urine)

A World Diabetes Day call: the key to diabetes–CKD co-management is acting early. Annual UACR screening is the simplest and most efficient way to find injury early. An HbA1c at target does not mean the kidney is safe — “metabolic memory” may continue to injure the kidney after glucose has normalized. Combined testing and integrated management are what make both glucose control and kidney protection possible.

10. Meet the Goldsite team at MEDICA 2026

See the HPLC HbA1c line (GSH-50, GSH-60 and GSH-120), Specific Protein (Aristo, GPP-100) and point-of-care HbA1c (A1c Go) at MEDICA 2026, 16 to 19 November, Messe Düsseldorf, Hall 1 · Stand B56. GSH-120 will have its world premiere at the show. Distributors and laboratory customers are welcome to book a booth meeting, and to ask at the stand about Aristo Ur and the diabetes and kidney co-management pairing.

About Goldsite Diagnostics

Focusing on In Vitro Diagnostics R&D and Manufacturing Since 1999.

Goldsite Diagnostics Inc., founded in 1999, specializes in in-vitro diagnostics devices and reagents. For more than 27 years, the company has been developing and producing IVD products, from China’s first specific protein analyzer to today’s nephelometry, HPLC HbA1c, POCT, hematology and biochemistry lines, as well as laboratory automation (TLA Lab Automation). Its market currently covers China and more than 100 countries.

Learn more: https://en.goldsite.com.cn/

This report is based on the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for CKD, the ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes 2025, and related evidence.

Research date: 13 November 2026 · World Diabetes Day (14 November) feature

For medical professionals only. This is not a clinical practice recommendation.

See Goldsite's latest trend on social media.

Goldsite Diagnostics Inc., founded in 1999, is a leading Chinese diagnostics manufacturer specializing in in-vitro diagnostics devices and reagents.

Quick Links

Product Links

Get in touch

    (+86)-755-26890807

        (+86)-755-26897973
   export@goldsite.com.cn

 

Copyright © 1999- 2023 Goldsite Diagnostics Inc., All rights reserved.  Sitemap